Author:
HOFER ADRIAN P.,HALMAN JOHANNES I.M.
Abstract
In their quest to manage the complexity of offering greater product
variety, firms in many industries are considering platform-based
development of product families. Key in this approach is the sharing of
components, modules, and other assets across a family of products.
Current research indicates that companies are often choosing
physical elements of the product architecture (i.e.,
components, modules, building blocks) for building platform-based
product families. Other sources for platform potential are widely
neglected. We argue that for complex products and systems with
hierarchic product architectures and considerable freedom in design, a
new platform type, the system layout, offers important
commonality potential. This layout platform standardizes the
arrangement of subsystems within the product family. This paper is
based on three industry case studies, where a product family based on a
common layout could be defined. In combination with segment-specific
variety restrictions, this results in an effective, efficient, and
flexible positioning of a company's products. The employment of
layout platforms leads to substantial complexity reduction, and is the
basis for competitive advantage, as it imposes a dominant design on a
product family, improves its configurability, and supports effective
market segmentation.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Reference34 articles.
1. Meyer, M.H. , Tertzakian, P. , & Utterback, J.M. (1997).Metrics for managing research and development in the context of theproduct family.Management Science 43(1),88–111.
2. Sawhney, M.S. (1998).Leveraged high-variety strategies: From portfolio thinking toplatform thinking.Journal of the Academy of Management Science 26(1),54–61.
3. Yu, J.S. , Gonzalez–Zugasti, J.P. , & Otto, K.N. (1998).Product architecture definition based on customer demands.ASME Design for Manufacturing Conference,DETC98/DFM-5679,Atlanta, GA.
4. Managing for variety in the order acquisition and fulfilment process: The contribution of product configuration systems
5. Modularity, product variety, production volume, and component sourcing: theorizing beyond generic prescriptions
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献