Author:
Charney Dennis S.,Davidson Jonathan R.T.,Friedman Matthew,Judge Rajinder,Keane Terry,McFarlane Sandy,Martenyi Ferenc,Mellman Thomas A.,Petty Frederick,Plewes John,Putnam Frank,Romano Steve,Van der Kolk Bessel A.,Yehuda Rachel,Zohar Joseph
Abstract
AbstractThe aim of this meeting was to obtain a consensus on what constitutes good research practice in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Objectives were to review relevant parameters of trials, such as the patients recruited, the means of assessing PTSD at baseline, and the change in symptomatology in response to treatment, and to reach a consensus on the most appropriate parameters to use in future research. The bases for the discussion were the 1995 National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and the National Center for PTSD consensus on the assessment of PTSD, results of drug treatment trials, and information on the assessment scales used in PTSD research.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Neurology (clinical)
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献