Do the old exploit the young? Is enfranchising children a good idea?

Abstract

Child poverty rates exceed those of elderly people in almost all Western nations. Moreover, it can be expected that the presently young generation (and yet unborn) will (far) less benefit from the welfare state than the elderly generation does and will continue to do. These inequalities between age groups and intergenerational inequities are, to a large extent, the result of the increasing numerical weight of elderly voters among the electorate to which political parties and governments respond. Giving voting rights to minor children, albeit vicariously exercised by parents, is one, repeatedly proposed approach to strengthening pro-family politics against the threat of gerontocratic politics (recently: Ringen 1997; van Parijs 1999). In the paper the pros and cons of this proposal are analyzed from two very different perspectives: (1) consequentialist arguments, i.e. those related to the desired/feared effects of enfranchising children on welfare state policy, intergenerational relations etc.; (2) deontological arguments, i.e. reasons whether or not an extension of voting rights ought to materialize.