Author:
Karpowitz Christopher F.,Monson J. Quin,Patterson Kelly D.
Abstract
AbstractWhat are the boundaries for discussing a candidate's religion? In the 2008 and the 2012 presidential campaigns, the religious beliefs and practices of at least one of the candidates became a subject of intense scrutiny from the media and the public. To ascertain the limits of social discourse for religious out-group, we conducted a survey experiment on the 2012 CCES survey. We find strong evidence that norms of social discourse do not apply to all religions equally. Furthermore, the application of norms differs by political party because Democrats and Republicans express concerns about different religious groups. Overall, there is a large difference for Muslims when it comes to social discourse. Finally, individuals have internalized the norms because most of them are willing to sanction those who violate them, even if the norms on social discourse are not applied equally among American voters.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Religious studies
Reference66 articles.
1. The Truth about Conservative Christians
2. The Graphical Presentation of a Collection of Means
3. Effects of Public Image Concerns and Self-image on Compliance
4. Monson J. Quin , and Scott Riding . 2008. “Social Equality Norms for Race, Gender, and Religion in the American Public during the 2008 Presidential Primaries.” Presented at the The Transformative Election of 2008 Conference, Ohio State University.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献