Author:
Gassmann Xavier,Malézieux Antoine,Spiegelman Eli,Tisserand Jean-Christian
Abstract
AbstractThis paper uses the COVID-19 health crisis to study how individual preferences respond to generalized traumatic events. We review previous literature on natural and man-made disasters. Using incentive-compatible tasks, we simultaneously estimate risk and ambiguity aversion, time discounting, present bias, and prudence parameters before, during, and after the COVID-19 lockdown in France. We find patience, risk aversion, and ambiguity aversion fell during lockdown, then gradually returned toward their initial levels 4 months later. These results have implications for health and economic policies, and deepen our understanding of the responses – and resilience – of economic preferences to traumatic events.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference76 articles.
1. The impact of personal control on performance and satisfaction
2. Higher order risk attitudes and prevention under different timings of loss
3. The attributional Style Questionnaire
4. Chantarat, S. , Chheng, K. , Minea, K. , Oum, S. , Samphantharak, K. , & Sann, V. (2015). The effects of natural disasters on households’ preferences and behaviours: Evidence from Cambodian rice farmers after the 2011 mega flood. Disaster Risks, Social Preferences, and Policy Effects: Field Experiments in Selected ASEAN and East Asian Countries , 85–130.
5. Accident Locus of Control and Risk Taking among Forestry and Construction Workers
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献