Abstract
Abstract
The Japan–Korea whitelist dispute (2019–2023) embodies key features of interstate disputes related to economic statecraft ideas. Against the backdrop of the legal dispute over Japan’s “essential security interests” claim based on GATT Article 21 (Security Exceptions), this study analyzes South Korea’s response to the whitelist dispute, with a focus on its materials–parts–equipment localization policy. The findings indicate that the policy process and outcomes align with very few of the criteria suggested by the new industrial policy literature. Notably, the policy’s goals and tools were driven by ideology rather than by science, and the implementing agency—The Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy—while competent, was politically captured. In conclusion, this study suggests that policymakers should purposefully and consciously connect security with trade or implement industrial policies within a well-defined strategic framework.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference40 articles.
1. Motohiro, Tsuchiya . 2019. “America, China, and the Battle for Techno-Hegemony.” April 16. Accessed December 21, 2023. https://www.nippon.com/en/in-depth/a06301/america-china-and-the-battle-for-techno-hegemony.html.
2. Goodman, Samuel , VerWey, John , and Kim, Dan . 2019. “The South Korea-Japan Trade Dispute in Context: Semiconductor Manufacturing, Chemicals, and Concentrated Supply Chains.” U.S. International Trade Commission Office of Industries Working Paper ID-062. Accessed December 21, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3470271.