Abstract
Stafford (1913) rejected the view of many early workers (see Ryder, 1883, 1884; Huxley, 1883; Horst, 1886) that oyster larvae cemented themselves to the substratum with secretions of the mantle edge. He thought that the mantle margin could not be extended sufficiently to form the extensive area of cement that he found on the left valve of cemented larvae. Furthermore, he argued that the mantle could not secrete so much material in the short period that larvae took to cement. He deduced from the much reduced state of the ‘byssus gland’ in settled larvae that this gland was the source of the cement and suggested that the cement was spread over the shell by the foot. Nelson (1924), Prytherch (1934), Cole & Knight-Jones (1939) and Cranfield (19736, c) have clarified the role of the foot in cementing. Nelson (1924) also noted that cementing oyster larvae extended the mantle margin over the substratum but considered that this action spread the cement discharged by the foot and that the folds themselves did not secrete more material. The other authors, like Stafford, have dismissed or ignored any part the mantle folds might play in cementing.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference32 articles.
1. On the receptors of marine invertebrates;Laverack;Oceanography and Marine Biology,1968
2. Electron microscope observations of the formation of the periostracum of Pinctada fucata;Wada;Bulletin of the National Pearl Research Laboratory,1968
3. The Role of Copper in the Setting, Metamorphosis, and Distribution of the American Oyster, Ostrea virginica
4. The functional morphology of the fourth fold of the mantle of the northern Quahog, Mercenaria mercenaria (L.);Hillman;Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society,1964
5. Observations on the behaviour of the pediveliger of Ostrea edulis during attachment and cementing
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献