Abstract
The focal article has given examples of children, other relatives, and friends as potential beneficiaries of preferential treatment and has discussed the counterbalancing likelihood of organizational gain from (properly) employing individuals who already share social connections. Surprisingly, there is minimal mention of spouses or domestic partners. From the 1970s through the 1990s, a number of articles were published on the legal and practical issues of applying antinepotism policies to spouses, but since 2000, the literature has been almost entirely silent. This is surprising given that, in 2013, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that 47.4% of U.S. families involve husbands and wives who both work.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Applied Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference9 articles.
1. Academic Couples: Implications for Medical School Faculty Recruitment and Retention
2. In defense of spousal hiring;Farley;Chronicle of Higher Education,2007
3. American Association of University Professors, Committee on Women in the Academic Profession. (2010). Recommendations on partner accommodation and dual-career appointments. Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/NR/rdonlyres/E8B6FE51-3765-4528-AC4F-874C8ECDB7D9/0/PartnerandDualCareerAppointments.pdf
4. Policing Nepotism and Cronyism Without Losing the Value of Social Connection
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献