Abstract
AbstractThis article examines the tensions within the international drug control system which are putting the until now consensual position in regard to the prohibition on drugs supply and use for anything other than medical and scientific use – the Vienna Consensus – under strain. The article examines a number of areas where policy stress is leading to controversy about potential violation of international drug control treaty obligations by states parties. Drawing a comparison with earlier periods of stress when drug control fell under the League of Nations, it suggests that what appears to be occurring is a shift in the Vienna consensus, and that the drug conventions are sufficiently flexible to permit resulting shifts in practice, although reform would be preferable.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference16 articles.
1. How flexible are the United Nations drug conventions?
2. Exiting treaties;Helfer;Virginia Law Review,2005
3. Reform by subtraction: The path of denunciation of international drug treaties and reaccession with reservations
4. A Critical Appraisal of the Department of Justice's New Approach to Medical Marijuana;Mikos;Stanford Law and Policy Review,2011
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献