Abstract
IntroductionEven though the logical structure of any formal deduction can be nicely expressed in a tree-form diagram, it is more practical to write it down in a series of propositions. In each step of inference, we usually deduce a proposition on basis of some foregoing propositions. However, global aspects of mathematical theories show us that this is not always the case. For, in mathematical theories, theorems are usually stated before their proofs. In fact, also in proofs of theorems, it is often practical that we prove propositions after stating them. Accordingly, in our real way of thinking, we arrange propositions going back and forth in the logical order.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference3 articles.
1. An investigation on the logical structure of mathematics (I);Kuroda;Hamburger Abhandlungen,1958
2. A theory of mathematical objects as a prototype of set theory;Ono;Nagoya J. of math.
3. Untersuchungen �ber das logische Schlie�en. I
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Semantics of Mizar as an Isabelle Object Logic;Journal of Automated Reasoning;2018-08-28
2. Flexary connectives in Mizar;Computer Languages, Systems & Structures;2015-12
3. REMARKS ON INFERENTIAL DEDUCTION;Contributions to Logic and Methodology in Honor of J. M. Bochenski;2014
4. Tentative Experiments with Ellipsis in Mizar;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2012
5. A Brief Overview of Mizar;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2009