The Contraceptive Pill in Ireland c.1964–79: Activism, Women and Patient–Doctor Relationships

Author:

Kelly Laura

Abstract

The twentieth-century history of men and women’s attempts to gain access to reproductive health services in the Republic of Ireland has been significantly shaped by Ireland’s social and religious context. Although contraception was illegal in Ireland from 1935 to 1979, declining family sizes in this period suggest that many Irish men and women were practising fertility control measures. From the mid-1960s, the contraceptive pill was marketed in Ireland as a ‘cycle regulator’. In order to obtain a prescription for the pill, Irish women would therefore complain to their doctors that they had heavy periods or irregular cycles. However, doing so could mean going against one’s faith, and also depended on finding a sympathetic doctor. The contraceptive pill was heavily prescribed in Ireland during the 1960s and 1970s as it was the only contraceptive available legally, albeit prescribed through ‘coded language’. The pill was critiqued by men and women on both sides of the debate over the legalisation of contraception. Anti-contraception activists argued that the contraceptive pill was an abortifacient, while both anti-contraception activists and feminist campaigners alike drew attention to its perceived health risks. As well as outlining these discussions, the paper also illustrates the importance of medical authority in the era prior to legalisation, and the significance of doctors’ voices in relation to debates around the contraceptive pill. However, in spite of medical authority, it is clear that Irish women exercised significant agency in gaining access to the pill.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

History,Medicine (miscellaneous),General Nursing

Reference147 articles.

1. Ibid., 8.

2. The Catholic Church and Married Women’s Sexuality: Habitus Change in Late 20th Century Ireland;Hilliard;Irish Journal of Sociology,2003

3. Hug, op. cit. (note 6), particularly chapters 3 and 4; Emilie Cloatre and Máiréad Enright,‘“On the Perimeter of the Lawful”: Enduring Illegality in the Irish Family Planning Movement, 1972–1985’, Journal of Law and Society, 44, 4 (2017), 471–500; Emilie Cloatre and Máiréad Enright, ‘McGee V Attorney General’, in Máiréad Enright, Julie McCandless and Aoife O’Donoghue (eds), Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017), 95–108. Linda Connolly, The Irish Women’s Movement: From Revolution to Devolution (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002); Linda Connolly and Tina O’Toole, Documenting Irish Feminisms, (Dublin: Woodfield Press, 2005).

4. Irish Family League, op. cit. (note 120), 6.

5. See: Diarmaid Ferriter's Occasions of Sin: Sex and Society in Modern Ireland (London: Profile Books, 2009). For further discussion of the debates surrounding the Health Family Planning Act, see: Aidan Beatty, 'Irish Modernity and the Politics of Contraception, 1979-1993', New Hibernia Review, 17, 3 (2013), 100-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3