Abstract
At the 2003 ARLIS/UK & Ireland Annual Conference, Creative partnerships, at the University of Sussex, a workshop entitled Documenting electronic resources: standards and challenges attracted delegates interested in exploring the practical and theoretical issues raised by cataloguing electronic resources in traditional library environments. This article further details recent changes made to the Anglo-American cataloguing rules to accommodate various types of e-resources. While quasi-established methods of representing such resources have undergone substantial revision, new metadata schemes are emerging and divisions between respective repositories containing different material types are disintegrating. Adapted or entirely new workflows for managing cataloguing of e-resources are under development (TrackER) and a fundamental restructuring of the very framework for relating data in bibliographic records to the needs of users (FRBR) may impact significantly on the representation of e-resources in library OPACs. Do these developments in any sense touch the library user whose ‘infosphere’ is underpinned by the seamlessness of Google’s PageRank algorithm and will the Research Libraries Group’s pilot service RedLightGreen sufficiently ‘Google-ize’ what libraries provide for these users?
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference93 articles.
1. Pixels and piety’ [review of the digital collection at the Museum of the History of Science in Florence, and the Galileo//thek@ project available via the link at;Kemp;Nature,2003
2. Cole T. W. , et al. ‘Now that we’ve found the hidden Web, what can we do with it? The Illinois Open Archives Initiative metadata harvesting experience’, paper presented at the 2002 Museums and the Web Conference (http://www.archimuse.com/mw2002/papers/cole/cole.html).
3. ArtSTOR
4. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of OCLC Online Computer Library Center's Web-Based Module on Cataloging Internet Resources Using the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules and MARC21