Abstract
Soviet and East European documents provide significant revelations about the
interactions of North Korea and its allies. First, they show Pyongyang's
longstanding interest in obtaining nuclear technology and probably nuclear
weapons. Second, they reveal that North Korea's leadership consistently evaded
commitments to allies on nuclear matters—particularly constraints on its nuclear
ambitions or even the provision of information. Third, North Korea's words and
deeds evoked substantial concerns in Moscow and other communist capitals that
Pyongyang, if it obtained nuclear weapons, might use them to blackmail its
partners or risk provoking a nuclear war. When aid from the Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics was not forthcoming, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea
sought to bypass Moscow and obtain assistance from the Kremlin's East European
clients and, when that proved fruitless, from Pakistan. The absence of
international support reinforced the logic of self-reliance and “military first,”
pushing North Korea to pursue an independent line with respect to its nuclear
weapons. These patterns cannot be extrapolated in a linear way, but they surely
suggest reasons for caution by those hoping to engage North Korea in a grand
bargain.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Development
Reference29 articles.
1. Lankov A. 2004. “The Troubled Russia-North Korea Alliance.”
Asia Times Online (December 25), at www.atimes.com/atimes/Korea/FL25Dg01.html
(accessed April 29, 2009).
2. “What A. Q. Khan Really Did.”;Bernstein;New York Review of Books,2009
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献