Abstract
ABSTRACTScientific societies played a crucial role in the emergence of a professional culture of science in Britain in the mid- to late-19th Century. At first sight, James Croll's membership of a limited number of scientific associations may be assumed to be the result of his lack of social credit and scientific connections. In this article, by examining Croll's correspondence, I demonstrate that Croll's select participation in scientific clubs and associations reflected his strategic pursuit of a vision of science set apart from party or societal affiliation. I focus on the contrasting histories of the Royal Society of Edinburgh and the Geological Survey, as well as the institutional history of the Philosophical Magazine. Situating the institutions in their respective social and cultural contexts, I argue that the more meritocratic, inclusive social structure of the Survey and Magazine helps explain Croll's choice to avoid affiliation with the Royal Society of Edinburgh.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT: OVERLOOKED EVIDENCE CONCERNING JAMES CROLL (1821–1890);Earth Sciences History;2023-01-01
2. ‘The most remarkable man’: James Croll, Quaternary scientist;Journal of Quaternary Science;2022-04
3. James Croll – bicentenary and biography, from janitor to genius;Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh;2021-09
4. In search of James Croll: archives, genealogy, publications and other resources;Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh;2021-09
5. James Croll – a man ‘greater far than his work’;Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh;2021-06-29