Abstract
Accurate assessment of the abundance of pinnipeds from
visual surveys requires estimation of both the available
(hauled-out) and unavailable (in-water) components of the
population (Eberhardt et al. 1979). Continental estimates of
the abundance of the four Antarctic seals are based on
limited information on haul-out behaviour. In developing
continental estimates, Erickson & Hanson (1990) corrected
visual surveys of the hauled-out component of the species'
populations using data from observational studies of haulout
behaviour by Erickson et al. (1989). Erickson & Hanson
(1990) point out that, because the observational studies did
not account for an unknown fraction of seals that remained
in the water during the peak haul-out period, their
abundance estimates are minimum values. Further,
Erickson & Hanson (1990) corrected the visual surveys for
all four species using haul-out data for the crabeater seal
only, as observational data for the other species were not
available. This assumes that haul-out patterns are constant
across species, which is largely untested. Consequently,
there is potential for bias, in both a relative and absolute
sense, in the estimated abundance of Antarctic seals.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Geology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Oceanography
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献