Abstract
This article introduces extra-canonical traditions into the debate about the purpose of the gospels and the risks of sociological mirror-reading. Often seen as reflecting sectarian communities, some of these texts are actually no more ‘heterodox’ than their canonical counterparts, and might just as well have been written ‘for all Christians’. However, applying similar criteria, we find that canonical as well as extra-canonical gospels are best understood as intended for a group of churches with similar outlook. Why certain gospels came to be widely distributed had more to do with power structures; intention and reception should not be confused.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Religious studies,History
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Acts of John within the Johannine Corpus;Studies on the Intersection of Text, Paratext, and Reception;2021-01-22
2. Index;Eschatology and the Saviour;2019-09-05
3. Bibliography;Eschatology and the Saviour;2019-09-05
4. TheGospel of Mary: Synopses of the Greek and Coptic MSS;Eschatology and the Saviour;2019-09-05
5. TheGospel of Mary: Text and Translations;Eschatology and the Saviour;2019-09-05