Abstract
Abstract
Fiscal capacity is regularly linked to warfare and democratization. However, the majority of income taxes – a cornerstone of government finance – were introduced by non-democratic states in peacetime. This paper is concerned with how autocratic politics shape the adoption and expansion of income taxes. Political institutions help overcome a commitment problem related to investments in taxation. To avoid being deposed by his or her elite supporters, a ruler needs to guarantee that new taxes will not be used opportunistically (e.g. expropriating the elite). If the elite supporters can effectively monitor the government, any transgressions will be detected and punishable. Institutions such as legislatures solve this commitment problem when they allow oversight and monitoring over the executive branch. The empirical implications are straightforward: in places with strong institutional oversight, which allows the elite to monitor the executive, we should observe higher fiscal capacity. I find support for this by analyzing newly available historical datasets over tax revenues, tax introduction dates, and political institutions.
Funder
United Nations University
Vetenskapsrådet
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference75 articles.
1. Brecke, P. (2001), ‘The Long-Term Patterns of Violent Conflict in Different Regions of the World’. Paper presented at the Uppsala Conflict Data Conference, Uppsala.
2. Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data
3. Strongmen and Straw Men: Authoritarian Regimes and the Initiation of International Conflict
4. Andersson, P. F. and Brambor, T. (2019), ‘Financing the State: Government Tax Revenue from 1800 to 2012’. Dataset.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献