Abstract
Abstract:The article tries to advance our understanding of institutional economics by critically examining the currently dominant discourse on institutions and economic development. First, I argue that the discourse suffers from a number of theoretical problems – its neglect of the causality running from development to institutions, its inability to see the impossibility of a free market, and its belief that the freest market and the strongest protection of private property rights are best for economic development. Second, I point out that the supposed evidence showing the superiority of ‘liberalized’ institutions relies too much on cross-section econometric studies, which suffer from defective concepts, flawed measurements and heterogeneous samples. Finally, I argue that the currently dominant discourse on institutions and development has a poor understanding of changes in institutions themselves, which often makes it take unduly optimistic or pessimistic positions about the feasibility of institutional reform.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference62 articles.
1. Kaufmann D. , Kraay A. , and Zoido P. (2002), ‘Governance Matters II: Updated Indicators for 2000–01’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2772, Washington, DC: World Bank.
2. Kaufmann D. , Kraay A. , and Mastruzzi M. (2006), ‘Governance Matters V: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators for 1996–2005’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4012, Washington, DC: World Bank.
3. Endogenizing institutions and institutional changes
4. On the Institutional Foundations of Law: The Insufficiency of Custom and Private Ordering
Cited by
276 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献