Abstract
The article argues that the passages typically employed to document the Romans' exploitation of chained slaves in the Italian countryside from the mid-Republic into the Principate actually have a quite different meaning. Theservus vinctusmentioned by Columella, Pliny and others is a label that became attached to slaves who were subjected (at least once) to punishment through chaining. The punishment reduced the value of the slave and, hence, it was a requirement upon sale to indicate whether a slave had been subjected to such chaining, that is whether they wereservi vinctiorservi soluti. What the passages in question do not show is how the Romans worked these or other slaves. Whatever their working conditions, the fate ofservi vinctibecame worse in the Empire as a result of thelex Aelia Sentiathat decreed thatservi vincticould not receive Roman citizenship upon manumission: they had thus become men without hope.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Archeology,History,Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Archeology
Reference63 articles.
1. Servi Vincti im römischen Weinbau. Restriktive Maßnahme zur Verhinderung der Flucht von Fachkräften oder Ausdruck ‘ökonomischer Rationalität’?;Stoll;Münsterische Beiträge zur Antiken Handelsgeschichte,1999
2. Settlement and Society in Early Imperial Etruria
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献