Abstract
We investigate whether inherent differences between the majority opinions of US Supreme Court justices result in certain justices being systematically more influential compared to their peers. We offer a theory in which lower court adoption of the Supreme Court’s precedents are influenced through justice opinion attributes, case characteristics, and circuit-level influences. To test the predictions, we examine the universe of responses by US Courts of Appeals to the signed majority opinions of individual justices by assembling a dataset of over 130,000 observations. We assess the interdependence of the mechanisms at work through a coarsened exact matching algorithm. We find that intricate tendencies in opinion writing disparately impact lower court attentiveness to the Supreme Court’s decisions. These findings offer new and important implications toward a richer understanding of the influence of individual justices on legal development and policy adoption in the American courts.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Social Sciences
Reference71 articles.
1. “Such Inferior Courts . . .”
2. Jeremiad or Weapon of Words?: The Power of Emotive Language in Supreme Court Dissents
3. The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court
4. Emsley, Richard , and Liu, Hanhua . 2013. “PARAMED: Stata Module to Perform Causal Me- diation Analysis Using Parametric Regression Model.” Unpublished manuscript.
5. Judicial Agenda Setting through Signaling and Strategic Litigant Responses;Baird;Washington University of Journal of Law and Policy,2009
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献