Abstract
This study examines legal opportunity in China after the recent “law-based governance” reforms, including those that have professionalized the judiciary, established NGOs’ public interest standing, and expanded legal aid coverage. Based on in-depth interviews, it finds that despite the generally tightening political control over the social sector, the reforms have helped some law-related NGOs expand their litigation practice, social and legislative influence, and domestic funding sources. At the same time, these changes have had considerable cooptation effects by aligning these NGOs’ interests with the state’s and channeling their activities into state-sanctioned institutional processes. The findings suggest that states can effectively utilize a dualist strategy that combines restrictive and supportive approaches to public participation in the legal process. It thus sheds light on the progression of legality within various political and institutional contexts.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Social Sciences
Reference73 articles.
1. The Rise of Judicial Governance in the Supreme Court of India;Mate;Boston University International Law Journal,2015
2. Wang, Shekun . “Field Report on the Roles and Functions of Environmental NGOs in Environmental Public Interest Litigation.” 2014. http://www.nrdc.cn/information/informationinfo?id=37&cook=2.
3. Weiquan (Rights Protection) Lawyering in an Authoritarian State: Building a Culture of Public-Interest Lawyering
4. Varieties of Legal Dualism: Making Sense of the Role of Law in Contemporary Russia;Hendley;Wisconsin International Law Journal,2011
5. Editorial