A comparative analysis of nutrition-related assessment criteria and associated nutrition performance scores of food companies across three prominent corporate sustainability assessment tools

Author:

Robinson EllaORCID,Chan Jasmine,O’Hearn Meghan,Mozaffarian DariushORCID,Sacks GaryORCID

Abstract

AbstractObjective:Corporate sustainability assessment tools are increasingly used to evaluate company performance on environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria. Given the growing burden of diet-related disease and nutrition-related business risks, it is important to understand the scope of nutrition-related ESG data currently available. This study aimed to compare the nutrition-related assessment criteria and associated food company performance across three prominent assessment tools.Design:Key attributes and assessment criteria of two civil society-led and one commercially available corporate sustainability assessment tools were extracted and compared for the year 2021. Company performance scores for twenty-five major food and beverage manufacturers using these three tools were analysed by nutrition domain: ‘Product Portfolio’, ‘Labelling’, ‘Marketing’, ‘Accessibility and Affordability’, ‘Governance and Reporting’, ‘Stakeholder Engagement’ and ‘Employee Health’. To enable comparison between tools, company performance scores were assigned to categories of low (score = 0–25 % score or D), moderately low (25–50 % or C), moderately high (50–75 % or B) and high (75–100 % or A).Setting:Global.Participants:N/A.Results:The tools covered similar nutrition domains; however, there was heterogeneity in the assessment criteria used to evaluate each domain. When applied to assess the performance of twenty-five major food and beverage manufacturers, a median nutrition-related performance score of moderately low or low was observed across all tools. The highest scoring domain was ‘Governance and Reporting’, and the lowest scoring domains were ‘Product Portfolio’ and ‘Accessibility and Affordability’.Conclusions:Greater standardisation of the nutrition-related criteria against which food companies are assessed is needed as part of efforts to drive improvements in food company practices.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference49 articles.

1. Latest Trends in Investing for Improved Nutrition and Obesity Prevention

2. An accountability framework to promote healthy food environments

3. The Effects of Mandatory ESG Disclosure around the World

4. 40. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) PfRIP & International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2022) Leading Financial Market Participants Call for Stronger Alignment of Regulatory and Standard Setting Efforts around Sustainability Disclosure. https://www.unpri.org/driving-meaningful-data-publications/companies-investors-and-professional-accountants-signed-on-to-the-call-for-global-alignment-between-sustainability-reporting-standard-setters-and-frameworks/10077.article (accessed December 2022).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3