Ethnicity as a predictor of detention under the Mental Health Act

Author:

Singh S. P.,Burns T.,Tyrer P.,Islam Z.,Parsons H.,Crawford M. J.

Abstract

BackgroundThere has been major concern about the ‘over-representation’ of Black and ethnic minority groups amongst people detained under the Mental Health Act (MHA). We explored the effect of patient ethnicity on detention following an MHA assessment, once confounding variables were controlled for.MethodProspective data were collected for all MHA assessments over 4-month periods in the years 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 each in three regions in England: Birmingham, West London and Oxfordshire. Logistic regression modelling was conducted to predict the outcome of MHA assessments – either resulting in ‘detention’ or ‘no detention’.ResultsOf the 4423 MHA assessments, 2841 (66%) resulted in a detention. A diagnosis of psychosis, the presence of risk, female gender, level of social support and London as the site of assessment predicted detention under the MHA. Ethnicity was not an independent predictor of detention.ConclusionsThere is no evidence for that amongst those assessed under the MHA, ethnicity has an independent effect on the odds of being detained.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology

Reference27 articles.

1. Police Admissions to a Psychiatric Hospital

2. A descriptive study of pathways to care among hospitalized urban African American first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum patients

3. Outcome of admission to a medium secure psychiatric unit

4. Churchill R , Wall S , Hotopf M , Buchanan A , Wessely S (1999). A systematic review of research relating to the Mental Health Act (1983). Department of Health (www.health.wa.gov.au/mhareview/resources/documents/Systematic_Review_of_MH_Legislation.pdf). Accessed 19 April 2003.

5. The Belmarsh Scheme a Prospective Study of the Transfer of Mentally Disordered Remand Prisoners from Prison to Psychiatric Units

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3