Saccadic abnormalities in psychotic patients. II. The role of neuroleptic treatment

Author:

Crawford T. J.,Haeger B.,Kennard C.,Reveley M. A.,Henderson L.

Abstract

SYNOPSISThe effects of dopamine-antagonistic neuroleptic (NL) medication on saccadic eye movements were compared in matched groups of 40 NL-treated and 18 NL-free schizophrenic patients and in 18 NL-treated and 14 NL-free bipolar affective patients. Manipulation of the saccadic paradigm yielded data on four types of saccade: those reflexively elicited by novel stimuli (REFLEX saccades), those directed towards the remembered location of a target now extinguished (REM) or towards the location where a predictably alternating target is expected to appear (PRED), or ANTI saccades, directed away from the stimulus to the mirror image location. Extensive psychiatric, neurological and neuropsychological assessments were also carried out on all subjects. The saccades of NL-treated patients, regardless of diagnosis, were less spatially accurate than those of NL-free patients, with a greater tendency to fall short of the target when generated towards the locus of a mentally represented target. This effect was greatest with a predictably alternating target, especially during periods when target visibility was withdrawn, only a temporal cue remaining. This pattern of impairment which is also found in early stages of Parkinson's disease is likely to be due to deficiency of striatal dopamine. Its best clinical predictors were disease duration, and Webster–Parkinsonism scores. Failure to suppress reflexive saccades to the stimulus in the REM and ANTI paradigms were more closely associated with schizophrenia than with NL treatment and were best predicted by negative symptoms and Wisconsin perseverative errors, both of which are widely regarded as indicators of frontal lobe dysfunction.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology

Cited by 85 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3