Coping with COVID: risk and resilience factors for mental health in a German representative panel study

Author:

Riepenhausen AntjeORCID,Veer Ilya M.,Wackerhagen Carolin,Reppmann Zala C.,Köber Göran,Ayuso-Mateos José Luis,Bögemann Sophie A.,Corrao Giovanni,Felez-Nobrega Mireia,Abad Josep Maria Haro,Hermans Erno,van Leeuwen Judith,Lieb Klaus,Lorant Vincent,Mary-Krause Murielle,Mediavilla Roberto,Melchior Maria,Mittendorfer-Rutz Ellenor,Compagnoni Matteo MonzioORCID,Pan Kuan-Yu,Puhlmann Lara,Roelofs Karin,Sijbrandij Marit,Smith Pierre,Tüscher Oliver,Witteveen Anke,Zerban Matthias,Kalisch Raffael,Kröger Hannes,Walter Henrik

Abstract

Abstract Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic might affect mental health. Data from population-representative panel surveys with multiple waves including pre-COVID data investigating risk and protective factors are still rare. Methods In a stratified random sample of the German household population (n = 6684), we conducted survey-weighted multiple linear regressions to determine the association of various psychological risk and protective factors assessed between 2015 and 2020 with changes in psychological distress [(PD; measured via Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression and Anxiety (PHQ-4)] from pre-pandemic (average of 2016 and 2019) to peri-pandemic (both 2020 and 2021) time points. Control analyses on PD change between two pre-pandemic time points (2016 and 2019) were conducted. Regularized regressions were computed to inform on which factors were statistically most influential in the multicollinear setting. Results PHQ-4 scores in 2020 (M = 2.45) and 2021 (M = 2.21) were elevated compared to 2019 (M = 1.79). Several risk factors (catastrophizing, neuroticism, and asking for instrumental support) and protective factors (perceived stress recovery, positive reappraisal, and optimism) were identified for the peri-pandemic outcomes. Control analyses revealed that in pre-pandemic times, neuroticism and optimism were predominantly related to PD changes. Regularized regression mostly confirmed the results and highlighted perceived stress recovery as most consistent influential protective factor across peri-pandemic outcomes. Conclusions We identified several psychological risk and protective factors related to PD outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. A comparison of pre-pandemic data stresses the relevance of longitudinal assessments to potentially reconcile contradictory findings. Implications and suggestions for targeted prevention and intervention programs during highly stressful times such as pandemics are discussed.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3