Continuum beliefs and mental illness stigma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of correlation and intervention studies

Author:

Peter Lina-JolienORCID,Schindler StephanieORCID,Sander ChristianORCID,Schmidt SilkeORCID,Muehlan HolgerORCID,McLaren ThomasORCID,Tomczyk SamuelORCID,Speerforck SvenORCID,Schomerus GeorgORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPromulgating a continuum model of mental health and mental illness has been proposed as a way to reduce stigma by decreasing notions of differentness. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines whether continuum beliefs are associated with lower stigma, and whether continuum interventions reduce stigma.MethodsFollowing a pre-defined protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42019123606), we searched three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO) yielding 6726 studies. After screening, we included 33 studies covering continuum beliefs, mental illness, and stigma. Of these, 13 studies were included in meta-analysis.ResultsContinuum beliefs are consistently associated with lower stigma. Interventions were effective at manipulating continuum beliefs but differ in their effects on stigmatising attitudes.ConclusionsWe discuss whether and to what extent attitudes towards people with mental illness can be improved by providing information on a mental health-mental illness continuum. It appeared to be relevant whether interventions promoted a feeling of ‘us’ and a process of identification with the person with mental illness. We discuss implications for the design of future interventions.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology

Reference79 articles.

1. The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence

2. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

3. Conceptualizing Stigma

4. Schoech (2017). Clinicians’ Perceptions of Trauma Treatment for People with Intellectual Disabilities. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/4171/.

5. An examination of Continuum Beliefs Versus Biogenetic beliefs in reducing stigma toward violent intrusive thoughts in OCD

Cited by 91 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3