Author:
DIEZEL K.,PHAROAH F. M.,ADAMS C. E.
Abstract
Background. Systematic reviews should identify all relevant
trials in order to minimize the potential
for bias and the play of chance in their results. Other specialities have
shown that conference
proceedings are a rich source of trials, but many of these trials are never
fully published.Methods. All clinical trials presented at a single conference
(Vth World Congress of Psychiatry,
Mexico, 1971) were identified by hand searching. Full publications of these
abstracts were then
sought on five databases by searching for the authors or relevant key words.Results. Full publications were found for 46% of the abstracts.
The odds of publication decreased
for abstracts that were from a non-Anglophone country or that failed to
mention randomization.Conclusions. Anyone wishing to undertake a systematic review
of a mental-health care topic should
search relevant conference proceedings for trials.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献