Police Shooting Statistics and Public Support for Police Reforms

Author:

Schiff Kaylyn JacksonORCID,Clark Tom S.,Glynn Adam N.,Owens Michael LeoORCID,Gunderson AnnaORCID,Dobbie EricORCID

Abstract

Abstract Does providing information about police shootings influence policing reform preferences? We conducted an online survey experiment in 2021 among approximately 2,600 residents of 10 large US cities. It incorporated original data we collected on police shootings of civilians. After respondents estimated the number of police shootings in their cities in 2020, we randomized subjects into three treatment groups and a control group. Treatments included some form of factual information about the police shootings in respondents’ cities (e.g., the actual total number). Afterward, respondents were asked their opinions about five policing reform proposals. Police shooting statistics did not move policing reform preferences. Support for policing reforms is primarily associated with partisanship and ideology, coupled with race. Our findings illuminate key sources of policing reform preferences among the public and reveal potential limits of information-driven, numeric-based initiatives to influence policing in the US.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference34 articles.

1. Motivated Innumeracy: Estimating the Size of the Gun Owner Population and Its Consequences for Opposition to Gun Restrictions;Joslyn;Politics and Policy,2018

2. Nonparametric Combination (NPC): A Framework for Testing Elaborate Theories;Caughey;The Journal of Politics,2017

3. Race and Reaction: Divergent Views of Police Violence and Protest Against;Reinka;Journal of Social Issues,2017

4. Public Opinion and Criminal Justice Policy: Theory and Research;Pickett;Annual Review of Criminology,2019

5. Barari, Soubhik and Simko, Tyler . 2021. “The Asymmetric Nationalization of Local Politics: Partisanship Aligns with Politics in Democratic Cities More Than Anywhere Else.” Working Paper.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3