A comparison of methods to assess changes in dietary patterns from pregnancy to 4 years post-partum obtained using principal components analysis

Author:

Northstone Kate,Emmett Pauline M.

Abstract

Few studies have examined the longitudinal nature of dietary patterns obtained using principal components analysis (PCA); the methods used are inconsistent. This paper investigates the methodologies used to assess stability and changes in such patterns. Pregnant women recorded frequency of consumption of various food items as part of regular self-completed questionnaires in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. This was repeated when their children were 4 years of age; 8953 women provided data at both times. Dietary patterns were identified using PCA and component scores were calculated at each time point. Additional ‘applied’ scores were created at 4 years using the loadings obtained from the PCA on the pregnancy data. Correlations were similar for each component across the time points, though slightly larger using the applied method. The applied scores were considerably lower on average than those obtained from separate PCA at 4 years. Women's scores decreased on ‘health conscious’ and ‘confectionery’ components while ‘processed’ and ‘vegetarian’ scores both increased over the 4-year period. In contrast, applied scores were systematically lower for all components. When split into quintiles, weighted κ was slightly higher between pregnancy and applied 4-year scores compared to the separate scores. In this cohort it was felt that the ‘applied’ method to obtain scores at the second time point was inappropriate, primarily due to the differences in FFQ between the two time points. We recommend that future studies using such ‘applied’ scores compare them with cross-sectional scores and consider the implications of any differences.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3