DISCUSSION: PRESENTATION OF ATMOSPHERIC 14CO2 DATA
-
Published:2024-03-27
Issue:2
Volume:66
Page:386-399
-
ISSN:0033-8222
-
Container-title:Radiocarbon
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Radiocarbon
Author:
Schwartz Stephen EORCID, Hua QuanORCID, Andrews David EORCID, Keeling Ralph FORCID, Lehman Scott JORCID, Turnbull Jocelyn CORCID, Reimer Paula JORCID, Miller John BORCID, Meijer Harro A JORCID
Abstract
ABSTRACTObservations of radiocarbon (14C) in Earth’s atmosphere and other carbon reservoirs are important to quantify exchanges of CO2 between reservoirs. The amount of 14C is commonly reported in the so-called Delta notation, i.e., Δ14C, the decay- and fractionation-corrected departure of the ratio of 14C to total C from that ratio in an absolute international standard; this Delta notation permits direct comparison of 14C/C ratios in the several reservoirs. However, as Δ14C of atmospheric CO2, Δ14CO2 is based on the ratio of 14CO2 to total atmospheric CO2, its value can and does change not just because of change in the amount of atmospheric14CO2 but also because of change in the amount of total atmospheric CO2, complicating ascription of change in Δ14CO2 to change in one or the other quantity. Here we suggest that presentation of atmospheric 14CO2 amount as mole fraction relative to dry air (moles of 14CO2 per moles of dry air in Earth’s atmosphere), or as moles or molecules of 14CO2 in Earth’s atmosphere, all readily calculated from Δ14CO2 and the amount of atmospheric CO2 (with slight dependence on δ13CO2), complements presentation only as Δ14CO2, and can provide valuable insight into the evolving budget and distribution of atmospheric 14CO2.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference57 articles.
1. Radiocarbon concentration in modern wood;Suess;Science,1955 2. Graven, HD , Guilderson, TP , Keeling, RF. 2012. Observations of radiocarbon in CO2 at seven global sampling sites in the Scripps flask network: analysis of spatial gradients and seasonal cycles. Journal of Geophysical Research 117. doi:10.1029/2011jd016535 3. Canadell, JG , et al. 2021. Global carbon and other biogeochemical cycles and feedbacks. In: Masson-Delmotte V, et al. editors. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. doi:10.1017/9781009157896.007. p. 673–816. 4. Yang, X , North, R , Romney, C. 2000. CMR nuclear explosion database (revision 3), CMR Tech. Rep. 00/16, Cent. for Monitor. Res., U. S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command, Arlington, VA. https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/∼richards/my_papers/WW_nuclear_tests_IASPEI_HB.pdf (downloaded 2020-0119). 5. Keeling, CD , Piper, SC , Bacastow, RB , Wahlen, M , Whorf, TP , Heimann, M , Meijer, HAJ. 2001. Exchanges of atmospheric CO2 and 13CO2 with the terrestrial biosphere and oceans from 1978 to 2000. I. Global aspects, SIO Reference Series, No. 01-06, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, San Diego, 88 pages. http://scrippsco2.ucsd.edu
|
|