Abstract
Abstract
Digital identity systems are not devised for their own sake, rather they are developed by institutions as part of their pursuit of specific goals—such as economic, social, and developmental outcomes through enabling individual rights and facilitating access to basic services and entitlements. A growing number of organizations and institutions are advancing specific principles, frameworks, and “imaginaries” of what “good” digital identity looks like—yet it is often not clear how much influence they have or what their underlying worldview is to those designing, developing, and deploying these systems. This paper introduces sociopolitical configurations as a means of studying these underlying worldviews. Sociopolitical configurations combine elements from technological frames, expectations, and imaginations as well as developmental discourses to provide a basis for critically examining three key documents in this space.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference67 articles.
1. Considering failure: Eight years of ITID research;Dodson;Information Technologies and International Development,2013
2. World Bank (2022) Identification for Development, World Bank. Available at https://id4d.worldbank.org/. (accessed on 19 October 2022).
3. Technological frames in public administration: What do public managers think of big data?;Guenduez;Government Information Quarterly,2020
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献