Abstract
AbstractThe First Amendment to the US Constitution protects commercial speech from government interference. Commercial speech has been defined by the US Supreme Court as speech that proposes a commercial transaction, such as marketing and labeling. Companies that produce products associated with public health harms, such as alcohol, tobacco, and food, thus have a constitutional right to market these products to consumers. This article will examine the evolution of US law related to the protection of commercial speech, often at the expense of public health. It will then identify outstanding questions related to the commercial speech doctrine and the few remaining avenues available in the United States to regulate commercial speech including the use of government speech and addressing deceptive and misleading commercial speech.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference97 articles.
1. Misperceptions about Added Sugar, Non-Nutritive Sweeteners and Juice in Popular Children’s Drinks: Experimental and Cross-Sectional Study with U.S. Parents of Young Children (1-5 years);Harris;Pediatric Obesity,2021
2. 86. Pomeranz, supra note 78.
3. The Wheels on the Bus Go ‘Buy Buy Buy:’ School Bus Advertising Laws;Pomeranz;American Journal of Public Health,2012
4. 9. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748, 762 (1976).
5. 62. Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. United States, 559 U.S. 229 (2010).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献