Author:
Grincheva Natalia,Stainforth Elizabeth
Abstract
Geopolitics of Digital Heritage analyzes and discusses the political implications of the largest digital heritage aggregators across different scales of governance, from the city-state governed Singapore Memory Project, to a national aggregator like Australia's Trove, to supranational digital heritage platforms, such as Europeana, to the global heritage aggregator, Google Arts & Culture. These four dedicated case studies provide focused, exploratory sites for critical investigation of digital heritage aggregators from the perspective of their geopolitical motivations and interests, the economic and cultural agendas of involved stakeholders, as well as their foreign policy strategies and objectives. The Element employs an interdisciplinary approach and combines critical heritage studies with the study of digital politics and communications. Drawing from empirical case study analysis, it investigates how political imperatives manifest in the development of digital heritage platforms to serve different actors in a highly saturated global information space, ranging from national governments to transnational corporations.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Reference342 articles.
1. Ayres, M. L. (2018). Unpublished Interview with Elizabeth Stainforth.
2. Struggling for Recognition? Strategic Disrespect in China’s Pursuit of Soft Power
3. Digital cultural colonialism: measuring bias in aggregated digitized content held in Google Arts and Culture
4. Gramer, R. (2017). Denmark Creates the World’s First Ever Digital Ambassador. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/01/27/denmark-creates-the-worlds-first-ever-digital-ambassador-technology-europe-diplomacy/.
5. National Library of Australia (NLA). (2009). New Directions 2009–2011. www.nla.gov.au/library/NLA_Directions_2009-2011.pdf.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献