Abstract
AbstractCollective action problems with public good characteristics such as climate change have important implications for international law. This note argues that behavioral insights from laboratory experiments, in which individuals engage in public goods games, can contribute to our understanding of how best to optimize the design of international legal regimes dealing with global public goods and common pool resources. Behavioral economics, to the extent it supplements or displaces rational-choice models in institutional design, may enable deeper and more sustained forms of international cooperation.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference76 articles.
1. Compliance of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol in the First Commitment Period;Shishlov;Climate Pol'y,2016
2. Parsing the Behavioral and Brain Mechanisms of Third-Party Punishment
3. Constraining Free Riding in Public Goods Games: Designated Solitary Punishers Can Sustain Human Cooperation;O'Gorman;Proc. Royal Soc’y B – Biological Sci.,2009
4. Discrimination via Exclusion: An Experiment on Group Identity and Club Goods
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献