Abstract
AbstractState and local employees comprise a significant proportion of the workforce and are largely covered by defined benefit pensions. Many of these retirement plans have been facing funding gaps, but legal restrictions often prevent them from reducing benefits for current employees. However, retirement plans can reduce liabilities by changing cost-of-living adjustments, or COLAs, which are commonly applied to benefits each year to allow retirees to maintain purchasing power in retirement. In this study, we examine the prevalence of COLAs in public sector retirement plans through original data collection for 49 plans in 30 states, which cover approximately 52% of public sector workers overall. Among these samples, on average 45% of workers each year experienced some change in COLAs between 2005 and 2018, with more than half of these workers experiencing negative changes. We consider stylized examples of public sector workers subject to reductions in COLAs to understand how COLAs may affect workers’ retirement decisions. Our analysis suggests that eliminating a 3% COLA could delay retirement of affected workers by approximately 4.5 months.
Funder
U.S. Social Security Administration
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Economics and Econometrics,Finance
Reference12 articles.
1. The link between pensions and retirement timing: Lessons from California teachers
2. Leiserson, G (2013) Retiree Health Insurance and Job Separations: Evidence from Pennsylvania State Employees, Essays on the Economics of Public Sector Employment (Dissertation). MIT.
3. Future Social Security Entitlements and the Retirement Decision
4. Munnell, A , Aubry, J-P and Cafarelli, M (2014) COLA Cuts in State/Local Pensions, Center for Retirement Research Issue Brief, Number 38.
5. How Teachers Respond to Pension System Incentives: New Estimates and Policy Applications