Author:
Anderson Isobel,Rennie Tullis
Abstract
This article considers the presence of ‘self-reflexive narrative’ in field recording. The authors interrogate a common presumption within sonic arts practice and sound studies discourse that field recordings represent authentic, impartial and neutral documents. Historically, field recording practice has not clearly represented narratives of how, when, why and by whom a field recording is made. In contrast, the social sciences have already experienced a narrative ‘turn’ since the 1970s, which highlighted the importance of recognising the presence and role of the researcher in the field, and also in representations of fieldwork. This provides an alternative framework for understanding field recording, in considering the importance of the recordist and their relationship with their recordings. Many sonic arts practitioners have already acknowledged that the subjective, personal qualities of field recording should be embraced, highlighted and even orated in their work. The authors’ own collaborative projectThoughts in the Fieldfurther explores these ideas, by vocalising ‘self-reflexive narratives’ in real time, within field recordings. The authors’ collaborative composition,Getting Lost(2015), demonstrates the compositional potentials this approach offers.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Music
Reference43 articles.
1. Soundmapping: Critiques and Reflections on This New Publicly Engaging Medium;Waldock;Journal of Sonic,2011
2. Bennett J. 2011. Raw Materials. http://vimeo.com/59842146 (accessed 1 July 2016). Between the Ears: White Rabbits in Sussex 2015. BBC Radio 3. www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06p4jvz (accessed 11 March 2016).
3. Field Recording, Sound Art and Objecthood
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献