Abstract
A Man whose height is four feet is short; adding one tenthof an inch to a short man's height leaves him short; therefore, a man whose height is four feet and one tenth of an inch is short. Now begin again and argue in the same pattern. A man whose height is four feet and one tenth of an inch is short; adding one tenth of an inch to a short man's height leaves him short; therefore, a man whose height is four feet and two tenths of an inch is short. In this way, it seems, we can reach the absurd result that a man whose height is four feet plus any number of tenths of an inch is short. For, if the first argument is sound, so is the second; and if the second, so is the third; and so on. There appears to be no good reason for stopping at any one point rather than at another; it is hard to see why the chain of arguments should ever be broken. But the conclusion is ridiculous; it is, for example, preposterous to say that a man whose height is seven feet is, nevertheless, short.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
74 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Foundations of Fuzzy Sets Theory;Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science Series;2023
2. Sustainable Consensus in an Uncertain Environment;Earth Systems Protection and Sustainability;2022
3. Foundations of Fuzzy Sets Theory;Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science;2022
4. Goguen's contributions to fuzzy logic in retrospect;International Journal of General Systems;2019-10-09
5. Pavelka-style fuzzy logic in retrospect and prospect;Fuzzy Sets and Systems;2015-12