Author:
Newsom Larry J.,Shaw David R.,Hubbard Thomas F.
Abstract
The goal of this research was to determine if differing levels of tolerance to AC 263,222 exist in soybean.14C-AC 263,222 was foliar-applied to ‘Coker 6955,’ ‘Hartz 6686,’ ‘Hutcheson,’ ‘9581 Pioneer,’ ‘9681 Pioneer,’ and ‘RA 606’ soybean cultivars. Differential absorption of14C-AC 263,222 was evident among cultivars 48 and 96 h after application. Movement out of the treated leaf was both acropetal and basipetal, indicating xylem and phloem mobility. Although absorption and translocation differences occurred among cultivars, these differences do not explain the differential response of soybean cultivars to AC 263,222. Metabolism of14C-AC 263,222 differed greatly among cultivars and increased with time. Ninety-six h after application, 9581 Pioneer metabolized 66% of the absorbed14C-AC 263,222, compared to RA 606, which metabolized only 41%. The large differences in metabolism that occurred 48 and 96 h after application suggest that metabolism is responsible for the differential response of soybean cultivars to AC 263,222.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference36 articles.
1. Soybean (Glycine max) Response to Chlorimuron and Imazaquin as Influenced by Soil Moisture
2. Soybean (Glycine Max) Tolerance and Sicklepod (Cassia Obtusifolia) Control with AC 263,222
3. Response of twenty determinate soybean (Glycine max) cultivars to imazaquin;Kent;Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc.,1988
4. Cadrerates and applications in Georgia peanut;Richburg;Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc.,1993
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献