Abstract
Judicial power is central to democratic consolidation and the rule of law. Public support is critical for establishing and protecting it. Conventional wisdom holds that this support is rooted in apolitical factors and not dependent on who is in political power. By contrast, we argue that support may be driven by instrumental partisan motivations and therefore linked to partisan alignment with the executive. We test the argument with survey evidence from 34 African countries. To provide causal evidence, we conduct difference-in-differences analyses leveraging Ghana’s three presidential transitions since 2000. Across Africa, support for judicial power is high, while trust in courts is lower. However, presidential co-partisans arelesssupportive of horizontal judicial power over the president andmoresupportive of vertical power over the people. The article demonstrates the importance of partisan alignment with the executive in shaping support for judicial power, with implications for judicial behavior and legitimacy.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
41 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Public (In)Tolerance of Government Non‐Compliance with High Court Decisions;Comparative Politics;2024-10-01
2. appendix;Electoral Commissions and Democratization in Africa;2024-09-19
3. Conclusions;Electoral Commissions and Democratization in Africa;2024-09-19
4. Electoral Commissions and Nigerian Voters;Electoral Commissions and Democratization in Africa;2024-09-19
5. Electoral Commissions and African Voters;Electoral Commissions and Democratization in Africa;2024-09-19