Abstract
While there is disagreement over the value of public shaming, scholars largely agree that social media introduce pathologies. But while scholars rightly identify the effects of online public shaming (OPS), they misidentify the cause. Rather than solely a problem of scale, OPS’s effects are also shaped by the network structure within which they take place. In this article, I argue that the social conditions necessary for productive public shaming are more likely to obtain in a closed social network structure. Using the cases of Twitter, Wikipedia, and Reddit, I show how the design of social media platforms facilitates different network structures among users, with differing results for OPS. In evaluating OPS by way of network structure, I argue, we can not only better understand why OPS works productively in some cases and not in others, but also derive lessons for how to deploy, discuss, and respond to it more effectively.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference94 articles.
1. Going Dark
2. Reddit Rules! Characterizing an Ecosystem of Governance
3. Crime, Shame, Reintegration, and Cross-National Homicide: A Partial Test of Reintegrative Shaming Theory
4. The Huffington Post. 2012. “Balpreet Kaur, Sikh Woman, Receives Remarkable Apology from Redditor Who Posted her Photo.” HuffPost. September 27. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/balpreet-kaur-receives-recieves-remarkable-apology-from-redditor_n_1919336.