Author:
BALDWIN KATE,HUBER JOHN D.
Abstract
Arguments about how ethnic diversity affects governance typically posit that groups differ from each other in substantively important ways and that these differences make effective governance more difficult. But existing cross-national empirical tests typically use measures of ethnolinguistic fractionalization (ELF) that have no information about substantive differences between groups. This article examines two important ways that groups differ from each other—culturally and economically—and assesses how such differences affect public goods provision. Across 46 countries, the analysis compares existing measures of cultural differences with a new measure that captures economic differences between groups: between-group inequality (BGI). We show that ELF, cultural fractionalization (CF), and BGI measure different things, and that the choice between them has an important impact on our understanding of which countries are most ethnically diverse. Furthermore, empirical tests reveal that BGI has a large, robust, and negative relationship with public goods provision, whereas CF, ELF, and overall inequality do not.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
339 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. On your own side of the fence;Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization;2024-10
2. Problem of the Plenty- Ethnic Fractionalization and Female Employment in Rural India;Journal of Quantitative Economics;2024-09-14
3. Endogenous State Capacity;Annual Review of Political Science;2024-07-29
4. Estonian Russians;Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy;2024-07-09
5. Slovak Hungarians;Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy;2024-07-09