An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd

Author:

BROWN NADIA E.ORCID,TORMOS-APONTE FERNANDOORCID,WONG JANELLEORCID

Abstract

As a discipline centered on power, political science provides an important window into potential responses to episodes of heightened attention to long-standing racial violence and inequality in the United States. During the summer of 2020, political science departments, like many other entities, issued public statements in response to the brutal murder of George Floyd and the long and ongoing history of deadly violence against Black people at the hands of law enforcement. This paper examines these statements, providing a descriptive analysis of themes raised and types of commitments to action. Rhetorical responses to racism constitute important sites for understanding how discursive power is deployed. Ultimately, we observe that proposed solutions contained in statements are not commensurate with the structural understanding of racism encapsulated in statements. These statements suggest that the status quo prevails even among those who study power. We document limited commitments to addressing racism in political statements.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Reference49 articles.

1. Tormos-Aponte, Fernando . 2022. “Two Years since George Floyd’s Killing: What Have Scientific Societies Done?” The Equation, October 25. https://blog.ucsusa.org/fernando-tormos-aponte/two-years-since-george-floyds-killing-what-have-scientific-societies-done/.

2. Denzin, Norman K. 2002. “The Interpretive Process.” In The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion, eds. Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 349–66. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412986274.n14

3. Organizational Responses in 2020: Addressing COVID-19, the Economic Recession, and the Black Lives Matter Movement;Yancey;The Psychologist-Manager Journal,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3