Abstract
This study considers whether and to what extent defections from a government coalition are punished. The study employs data on coalitions in eastern and western Europe from 1950 through 2006. The results show that if a coalition breaks due to conflict between partners or if one party withdraws from it, subsequent inclusion of the conflicting parties in the same coalition becomes less likely. Additional tests demonstrate that this effect occurs because defectors are punished by their former coalition partners. Another extension of the main analysis shows that rather than becoming pariah parties, defectors lose credibility only in the eyes of their former coalition partners.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference42 articles.
1. Coalition Termination and the Strategic Timing of Parliamentary Elections
2. A theory of coalitions and clientelism: Coalition politics in Iceland, 1945-2000
3. The Importance of Concurrence: The Impact of Bicameralism on Government Formation and Duration
4. Reformierakond . 2003b. “Koalitsioonikõnelused jätkuvad esmaspäeval ilma Isamaaliiduta” [The coalition negotiations continue on Monday without the IL]. http://www.reform.ee/ee/uudised-uritused-pressiteated-meedia-kontakt/reformierakondpressiteated-uudised/uudis/1107/koalitsioonikonelused-jatkuvadesmaspaeval-isamaaliiduta (Accessed November 5, 2008).
5. Bargaining in Legislatures
Cited by
58 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献