Abstract
The credibility of election outcomes hinges on the accuracy of vote tallies. We provide causal evidence on the drivers and the downstream consequences of variation in the quality of vote tallies. Using data for the universe of polling stations in Mexico in five national elections, we document that over 40% of polling-station-level tallies display inconsistencies. Our evidence strongly suggests these inconsistencies are nonpartisan. Using data for more than 1.5 million poll workers, we show that lower educational attainment, higher workload, and higher complexity of the tally cause more inconsistencies. Finally, using an original survey of close to 80,000 poll workers together with detailed administrative data, we find that inconsistencies cause recounts and recounts lead to lower trust in electoral institutions. We discuss policy implications.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference34 articles.
1. Machines Versus Humans: The Counting and Recounting of Pre-Scored Punchcard Ballots
2. Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections
3. The 2012 elections in Mexico: Return of the dominant party
4. Autheman, Violaine . 2004. “The Resolution of Disputes Related to ‘Election Results’: A Snapshot of Court Practice in Selected Countries around the World.” In IFES Rules of Law Conference Paper Series. http://aceproject.org/ero-en/topics/electoral-dispute-resolution/ConfPaper_Indonesia_FINAL.pdf.
5. Inconsistencias Contaminantes: Gobernación Electoral y Conflicto Poselectoral en las Elecciones Presidenciales del 2006 en México;Schedler;América Latina Hoy,2009
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献