Abstract
In the United States, elections are often administered by directly elected local officials who run as members of a political party. Do these officials use their office to give their party an edge in elections? Using a newly collected dataset of nearly 5,900 clerk elections and a close-election regression discontinuity design, we compare counties that narrowly elect a Democratic election administrator to those that narrowly elect a Republican. We find that Democrats and Republicans serving similar counties oversee similar election results, turnout, and policies. We also find that reelection is not the primary moderating force on clerks. Instead, clerks may be more likely to agree on election policies across parties than the general public and selecting different election policies may only modestly affect outcomes. While we cannot rule out small effects that nevertheless tip close elections, our results imply that clerks are not typically and noticeably advantaging their preferred party.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference63 articles.
1. Stewart, Charles III . 2021. “How We Voted in 2020: A Topical Look at the Survey of the Performance of American Elections.” Technical Report. https://electionlab.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2021-03/HowWeVotedIn2020-March2021.pdf.
2. Normalizing Corruption
3. Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics
4. López-Pintor, Rafael . 2000. “Electoral Management Bodies as Institutions of Governance.” Technical Report UNDP.
5. The Street-Level Bureaucrats of Elections: Selection Methods for Local Election Officials
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. How Election Rules Affect Who Wins;Journal of Legal Analysis;2024-01-01