Abstract
Many political scientists hold that vitriolic speech against high-profile women has only negligible effects on other women in politics. They also contend that the prevalence of such vitriol is consistent with gender bias having no significant negative impact on most women in politics. This article argues that these sanguine positions rest on inadequate and untested assumptions regarding misogyny, and the role it plays in politics. In the service of putting us in a position to test the relationship between gendered discourse in particular elections and the structural obstacles faced by women in politics, this article develops a conceptualization of political misogyny: nasty claim-making that instills repugnant connotations into women’s collective political identities (e.g., their partisan identities). Attention is also paid to how political misogyny can distribute hatred burdens disproportionately among different groups of women.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference76 articles.
1. Party and Gender Stereotypes in Campaign Attacks
2. Are Lesbians Women?
3. How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation
4. Violence against Women in Politics
5. Thorpe, J. R. 2016. “The Odd Origins of the Word ‘Nasty.’” Bustle, October 20. https://www.bustle.com/articles/190716-the-origins-of-nasty-as-a-word-insult-to-women.