Author:
Allison M. F.,Jaggard K. W.,Armstrong M. J.
Abstract
SummarySummary Between 1985 and 1988, 14 field experiments at different sites in the UK assessed the effect of applying P, K, Na and Mg in autumn, early spring, late spring or as a split application in both autumn and late spring on the growth, yield and processing quality of sugarbeet. Supplementary experiments compared Kaynitro and Chilean nitrate of soda. None of the treatments had any effect on plant population densities, and any differences in sugar yield could be explained by the leaching of Na. The effects on processing quality were inconsistent and unlikely to be of agronomic or economic significance. Generally, Kaynitro and Chilean nitrate of soda performed no better than the other fertilizers so it is unlikely that their extra cost would be justified. Apart from Na, the timing of nutrient application appeared to be unimportant, even on soils of low fertility. However, Na, being very mobile, was best applied in spring.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Genetics,Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference30 articles.
1. Ploughing down phosphorus and potassium for sugar beet;Clare;Experimental Husbandry,1978
2. How long does applied sodium remain in the soil?;Tinker;Information from the Nitrate Corporation of Chile Ltd,1970
3. The effects of very deep ploughing and of subsoiling on crop yields
4. Timing the application of P, K, Na and Mg fertilisers;Armstrong;British Sugar Beet Review,1990
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献