Abstract
1. Six methods of diluting chicken's blood prior to counting erythrocytes and leucocytes in haemacytometers have been studied. No difficulty is found in recognizing erythrocytes. The most satisfactory method of counting leucocytes was the method described by Natt & Herrick (1952) in which the diluent contains methyl violet. Formulae are given which enable standard errors of estimates to be calculated.2. Three methods of staining blood smears for the differentiation of the various leucocytes have been studied. The method using Leishman's stain appeared to result in good differentiation and was simple to use. However, an experiment to study sampling errors has shown that there may be considerable differences between observers in the percentages of lymphocytes and heterophils when the latter are high, showing that the estimates of these quantities may be biassed. These differences may have been caused by a tendency for heterophils to concentrate to the edges of the smears and for the observers to select different fields for their counts.3. Although blood counts varied only slightly during the day, there were considerable differences from day to day. The average erythrocyte count for ten chickens fluctuated between about 2·9 and 3·5 millions per mm.3 during the first 3 weeks after hatching and was more steady for the next 4 weeks at about 2·9 millions per mm.3. The average leucocyte count rose from about 10,000 to 35,000 per mm.3 during the first 7 weeks of life, the rate of increase being greatest when the chickens were youngest; the rise was mainly due to a rise in the number of lymphocytes.4. There were also considerable differences in blood counts between chickens even though environmental and genetic conditions were standardized as far as possible.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Genetics,Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献