Abstract
A badly trimmed ascription can be more a matter for relish than regret: if enough of the composer's name survives to permit informed speculation, the musicologist's sense of pleasure is likely to outweigh his sense of loss. Most musical manuscripts from the late Middle Ages have visibly suffered at the hands of the binder's knife, but perhaps none more so than the famous ‘Aosta Manuscript’ (I-AO15), one of the central sources of early fifteenth-century sacred polyphony. In his inventory of the manuscript Guillaume de Van reported no fewer than twenty names as surviving in varying states of incompleteness. In fifteen instances he was able to decipher the composer's name or supply it from the manuscript's index or a concordant source, while the other five apparently defeated him. Two of the names have since been deciphered, and a third has been identified from another source, but the remaining two have attracted no further comment.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference9 articles.
1. Manuscript Structure in the Dufay Era;Acta Musicologica,1962
2. A Florentine Chansonnier from the Time of Lorenzo the Magnificent
3. Proportion and Form in the Continental Isorhythmic Motet c. 1385-1450
4. A Recently Discovered Source of Early Fifteenth Century Polyphonic Music;de Van;Musica Disciplina,,1948