Author:
Smith Alexander,Fulford Michael
Abstract
AbstractThe evidence of the character and purpose of settlements previously described as defended ‘small towns’ is reviewed in the light of knowledge accrued since the implementation of Planning Policy Guidance 16 in 1990, the same year as the publication of Burnham and Wacher's survey,The ‘Small Towns’ of Roman Britain. This review focuses on four of the more extensively excavated settlements: Alcester, Cambridge, Godmanchester and Worcester. In the absence of convincing urban attributes, it is suggested that this category of settlement should more appropriately be regarded as defended villages (vici). These cluster in and around the West Anglian plain and on Ermine Street, suggesting a strategic function to protect grain and other food supplies and their movement, potentially either to the northern frontier or south to London and, perhaps, export to the Continent.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Archaeology,History,Archaeology,Classics
Reference142 articles.
1. WCC 2008: Archaeological Investigations of the Alcester Flood Alleviation Scheme Area 3B Newport Drive and Willow Close 2002, Post-excavation Assessment, Warwickshire County Council Report 0744
2. Roman Settlement in the Lower Nene Valley
3. Wainwright J. 2014: Archaeological Investigations in St John's, Worcester, Worcestershire Archaeology Research Report 4
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献